A comparative analysis of government pay structures that reveals uncomfortable truths about talent retention and governance quality
The Shocking Reality
Despite having nearly identical per capita incomes—Bangladesh at $2,840 and India at $2,878—the salary structures of their respective civil services tell a drastically different story. In a revelation that should concern every policy maker, Bangladesh's BCS (civil service) officers earn significantly less than India's lowest-grade government employees.
This isn't just about numbers; it's about national competitiveness, brain drain, and the fundamental question of how we value the people who run our countries.
Breaking Down the Numbers
India currently operates under the 7th Pay Commission (2016-2025) with 18 grades. When they transitioned from the 6th to 7th Pay Commission, they applied a fitment factor of 2.57, meaning:
- Previous minimum salary: ₹7,000
- Current minimum salary: ₹18,000 (₹7,000 × 2.57)
- Salary range for lowest grade: ₹18,000 - ₹56,900
This explains why PhD holders often apply for peon positions in India—the compensation is genuinely attractive.
Looking ahead to 2025, the '8th Pay Commission' is expected to use a fitment factor of 2.86, which would raise the minimum salary to approximately ₹51,500. The total package would easily exceed ₹1 lakh per month.
At the highest level (Grade 18), officers receive a basic salary of ₹2,50,000, with total compensation approaching half a million rupees monthly.
### Bangladesh's Concerning Reality
Bangladesh operates under the 8th Pay Scale (since 2016) with 20 grades:
- Lowest grade (Grade 20): ৳8,250 basic salary
- First-class officers: ৳22,000 basic salary
- In Indian rupee equivalent: ৳22,000 = ₹15,400 (at 1 BDT = 0.70 INR)
The stark reality is a Bangladeshi BCS officer earns ₹2,600 less than an Indian peon.
## The Cost of Living Paradox
Adding insult to injury, the cost of living comparison reveals:
- Food and essential goods: 30% more expensive in Bangladesh
- Some items: 2-3 times costlier than India
- Healthcare costs: Lower in India
- Tax exemption ceiling: India ₹3 lakh vs Bangladesh ₹2,62,500 equivalent
This creates a devastating combination: lower salaries with higher living costs.
## The Ripple Effects
- Brain Drain Crisis
When the country's brightest minds see better opportunities as peons in neighboring countries, the exodus becomes inevitable. This isn't just about individual choices—it's about national capacity building.
- The Corruption Trap
The author astutely observes that people join government service in Bangladesh for two reasons:
- Respect (which doesn't pay bills)
- Corruption opportunities (which destroys institutional integrity)
When honest officers can't maintain dignity on their salaries, the system naturally selects for those willing to find "alternative" income sources.
- Sectoral Collapse
Healthcare: Government doctors moonlight in private chambers because their official salaries are inadequate. Meanwhile, expensive medical equipment lies unused in government hospitals.
Education: Teachers depend on private tuition rather than focusing on institutional teaching, perpetuating an inefficient education system.
## The False Economy of Low Wages
When recent reforms provided a 10% special allowance, the lowest grade employees saw their salaries increase by merely **৳237.50 per month**. For a family of 4-5 members earning ৳14,000 monthly, this amount disappears before lunch on the first day of work.
### The Economist's Fallacy
The author powerfully challenges the conventional economic wisdom that opposes salary increases:
> "If ৳7,000 crore additional budget expenditure causes inflation, why doesn't corruption worth lakhs of crores cause inflation? Or is this a subtle conspiracy to keep Bangladesh's bureaucracy weak and prevent the country's success?"
## Learning from India's Success
India's civil service, despite its flaws, demonstrates what adequate compensation can achieve. Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar's confidence on international platforms doesn't emerge from thin air—it's backed by a system that attracts and retains quality talent.
The author notes that even if only 25% of India's civil servants truly perform (with 25% corrupt and 50% average), that 25% is sufficient to drive national progress. **This 25% makes all the difference**.
## The Path Forward
1. Quality Over QuantityI
nstead of 2 million government positions, Bangladesh could achieve better results with 600,000-700,000 well-compensated, skilled professionals.
2. Address Root Causes
Rather than superficial fixes, fundamental compensation reform is needed to:
- Attract top talent to public service
- Reduce corruption incentives
- Improve service delivery
- Enhance international negotiating capacity
3. Break the Syndicate
The current system serves certain interests that benefit from cheap labor and weak governance. Breaking this requires political will and economic courage.
This analysis isn't just about salary comparisons—it's about national vision and priorities. A country that doesn't value its public servants adequately cannot expect quality governance, efficient service delivery, or international respect.
The question isn't whether Bangladesh can afford to pay its civil servants properly—it's whether Bangladesh can afford not to. The choice is clear, either continue with a system that breeds mediocrity and corruption, or invest in human capital that can drive genuine transformation. The numbers don't lie, and neither do the consequences of ignoring them.
What are your thoughts on this pay scale disparity? How do you think Bangladesh can address this fundamental challenge? Share your views in the comments below.
0 Comments